Show Posts
1
Regional Hazard Simulation (R2D, rWhale) / Questions on new Regional Resilience Determination (R2D) Tool
« on: May 07, 2021, 07:04:28 PM »
Kudos to the team for developing this tool!
Some questions from trying out the tool:
1. What kind of assessment is this intended for (i.e., scenario-based assessment, intensity-based, risk-based)?
2. What is the basis for selecting records in the HAZ tab (EQ scenario simulation)? If it is to match a given target spectrum, is this an intensity-based assessment? Does the record selection depend on the choice for "Earthquake Rupture"?
3. If "Earthquake Rupture Forecast" (ERF) is chosen, what is meant by "Earthquake Name" since ERF typically includes a collection of different plausible ruptures?
4. In ANA tab, what is meant by "IMasEDP"?
5. In DL tab, what is meant by "Hazus MH EQ" and "Hazus MH EQ IM"?
6. In DL tab, what is meant by "Include ground failure"?
Some questions from trying out the tool:
1. What kind of assessment is this intended for (i.e., scenario-based assessment, intensity-based, risk-based)?
2. What is the basis for selecting records in the HAZ tab (EQ scenario simulation)? If it is to match a given target spectrum, is this an intensity-based assessment? Does the record selection depend on the choice for "Earthquake Rupture"?
3. If "Earthquake Rupture Forecast" (ERF) is chosen, what is meant by "Earthquake Name" since ERF typically includes a collection of different plausible ruptures?
4. In ANA tab, what is meant by "IMasEDP"?
5. In DL tab, what is meant by "Hazus MH EQ" and "Hazus MH EQ IM"?
6. In DL tab, what is meant by "Include ground failure"?