Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - adindar

Pages: [1]
1
Uncertainty Quantification (quoFEM) / Results in file
« on: November 07, 2022, 05:46:56 AM »
Dear all,
I've noticed an issue when I'd like to see the quoFEM results not on RES tab but in the produced file. I've placed the screenshots in the attached file which is explained below.

A. Start quoFEM and select an example (Ex 1).
B. Run quoFEM
C. Look into BIM.json file and see that I found the lines from input.json.
D. If I re-run the quoFEM then BIM.json is changed.
E. The results are now in the end of BIM.json file for Ex 1.
F. Following Ex 1, if I select and run another example (Ex 2), BIM.json now contains input.json from Ex 2 but the summary part is still Ex 1.
G. re-run quoFEM for Ex 2 and then summary of BIM.json is now containing results of Ex 2.

If this is an issue, I may state that quoFEM is not dumping the results to BIM.json file once the analysis completed. I noticed this as an issue but perhaps someone may have an explanation.

The motivation of looking into BIM.json file is to access the quoFEM results not through the interface but the produced files. Is there any other file(s) where I may read the results rather than mingling with BIM.json file.

Looking forward prompt reply.

++Ahmet Anil Dindar


2
Dear all,
I'm very much pleased running examples in quoFEM. As come to create my own problem I'm facing a simple but hard issue  :)

I'm trying to obtain the best value in a simple cantilever tip deflection problem using 1) direct formula 2) openseespy. I include the files for first approach to this message and a pdf screenshots file. 

I'm facing the same error message  " No dakotaTab.out file - dakota failed .. possibly no QoI " in the UI. It seems that I'm missing very fundamental but tricky point in the json file. I hope you can let me find where I'm failing.

Best regards

++Ahmet

3
Programming Bootcamp / Shall we write a small programme?
« on: August 18, 2020, 10:08:27 PM »
Dear all,
It's been seven class days as of today and three days more to go.

I suggest to develop a programme by the collaboration with volunteers. We can benefit from Github for code sharing and development.

The programmes I'd recommend;
  • Reinforced Concrete Section Analysis (moment-curvature) with simple material models
  • Beam deflection analysis (linear elastic material and static forces)

Why don't we write one of the above or your possible suggestions in Python and in C/C++. Perhaps, we may try the openMPI if we write in C/C++.

I wonder your response whether this is a fruitful or worthless effort?

Best regards from Istanbul.

++Ahmet Anil Dindar

4
Programming Bootcamp / Forking a repository
« on: August 14, 2020, 05:01:24 PM »
Dear all,
I'd forked the Bootcamp repository and done "git clone https://github.com/ahmetanildindar/SimCenterBootcamp2020" to my computer prior the start of the classes. This happened last Friday.

I was late to the first hour yesterday and missed some topics on git.

Here is my question; is it possible to update my forked repository which is of course behind the current Simcenter and somehow sync with current Simcenter?

I hope I've expressed myself well.

++Ahmet

Pages: [1]