Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - kuanshi

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
31
Earthquake Engineering (EE-UQ) / Re: AutoSDA's default .tcl file
« on: September 17, 2021, 09:07:37 PM »
Sorry about the confusion!  Yes, it could be used for running OpenSees models created by the AutoSDA module.

Kuanshi

32
Regional Hazard Simulation (R2D, rWhale) / Re: Running classical PSHA in R2D
« on: September 17, 2021, 09:03:22 PM »
Hi Anne,

Thanks for sharing the GSIM folder - yes, the running message in the PowerShell looks ok and the run completed successfully while there might be an issue in post-processing - let me try to replicate this with the shared GSIM folder to debug.

Yes, I can copy the calc_x.h5 from the oq default directory to the /LocalWorkDir/HazardSimulation/GroundMotions/Output/.  I'm also working to allow user to choose different version of oq (or local instance, if this is needed) in UI to run (this may also help get rid of the GSIM related issue...) - will update a build with the saving calc.h5 feature and get you back.

Kuanshi

33
Regional Hazard Simulation (R2D, rWhale) / Re: Extracting simulated IM fields from R2D
« on: September 17, 2021, 06:32:19 PM »
Hi Anne,

The SiteIM.json is designed for saving the final individual realizations of ground motion spectra - as median and standard deviations are actually not really used by later building response/damage/loss simulations.  But if you're interested, I could save them to an individual file under the same directory.

And the zTR is the depth to the rock - zero indicates a rock site, while it is exported for site-response simulation, and not actually used in "Earthquake Scenario Simulation" - sorry about the confusion!

Best,
Kuanshi

34
Earthquake Engineering (EE-UQ) / Re: AutoSDA's default .tcl file
« on: September 17, 2021, 06:12:37 PM »
Hi Anne,

The test tolerance is updated in the example folder for the AutoSDA example (https://github.com/NHERI-SimCenter/EE-UQ/pull/83).  Also, thank you so much for the feedback of the place of the OpenSees solver tcl file!  I fully agree with you that these tcl files included in /Examples folder are more geared to individual examples themselves - as it would be difficult to have a universal solver working perfectly for all different models and simulations... And in the EE-UQ, it is flexible for users to modify or use different analysis scripts for their own application by browsing "Analysis Script" in the FEM panel: https://nheri-simcenter.github.io/EE-UQ-Documentation/common/user_manual/usage/desktop/FEM.html.

Thanks,
Kuanshi

35
Earthquake Engineering (EE-UQ) / Re: location of acceleration component pulldown in EE-UQ
« on: September 17, 2021, 05:52:54 PM »
Hi Anne,

Thanks again for this feedback!  An edits was made following your suggestion in the EE-UQ (https://github.com/NHERI-SimCenter/EE-UQ/pull/83 will be incorporated into the next release) and the UI now is like the attached picture below.

Kuanshi

36
Regional Hazard Simulation (R2D, rWhale) / Re: Running classical PSHA in R2D
« on: September 17, 2021, 04:48:24 AM »
Hi Anne,

Thanks for identifying this error!  The first warning message about "trucation_level" was caused by an typo error in the backend and has been fixed in the 210916 build: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T84xXse06K2O3IztKP_crRuPMbUa8HpG/view?usp=sharing.  While testing the scripts directly via the openquake, I could not replicate the "proj.db" error but received error messages that the user-provided GMPE names 'AbrahamsonEtAl2014LHC' is unknown GSIM.  This is mostly like caused by the OpenQuake version - maybe we could meet to see which release of OpenQuake you are using and to resolve the issue together.

Regards,
Kuanshi

37
Regional Hazard Simulation (R2D, rWhale) / Re: R2D: extracting realizations from openquake
« on: September 17, 2021, 04:38:55 AM »
Hi Anne,

Thanks for helping testing the nightly builds with OpenQuake classical PSHA and sharing the scripts with us!  I implemented this feature of extracting the realizations.csv file in the 210916 build here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T84xXse06K2O3IztKP_crRuPMbUa8HpG/view?usp=sharing and the test input files here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/10ln_4rqEe9MSv5Ljbcf2v08OPTkb6WfR/view?usp=sharing.

Many thanks again!
Kuanshi

38
Regional Hazard Simulation (R2D, rWhale) / Re: Correct way to simulate a M7.2 EQ near San Francisco
« on: August 17, 2021, 09:36:35 PM »
Hi Rodrigo,

Sorry about the confusion due to this issue - after diagnosing the problem, a bug was identified and fixed in filtering the earthquake rupture distance.  Attached below please find the FetchOpenSHA.py script (also in a recent commit - https://github.com/NHERI-SimCenter/SimCenterBackendApplications/pull/94/commits/f27b02c5b992ea0c4912e9dd62b855c149019bbd) and the output IMs folder of the test (99 realizations of PGA for each site in the SiteList.csv).

This is going to be updated into the next release, but in the meantime, a quick patch for this issue on your local is: please download the attached python script and paste it into the directory under the R2D application (i.e., "R2D_Windows_Download/applications/performRegionalEventSimulation/regionalGroundMotion").  Please test and feel free to get me back.  Sorry again about this inconvenience and thank you so much for identifying and reporting this problem to us!

Kuanshi

39
Regional Hazard Simulation (R2D, rWhale) / Re: Hazard Simulation Error exit code 1
« on: July 14, 2021, 12:52:53 AM »
Thanks for sharing the file!  Yes, the bug was finally identified together to be caused by missing a Java install.  The problem is resolved by installing/configuring Java following the instruction on-screen instructions from the official website.   

In the meantime, for uses who have any questions or trouble of installing Java and running the "Earthquake Scenario Simulation" tool, please feel free to get us back. More details can also be found here.

Thanks,
Kuanshi

40
Regional Hazard Simulation (R2D, rWhale) / Re: Hazard Simulation Error exit code 1
« on: July 13, 2021, 10:45:13 PM »
Thanks for sharing them!  The configuration file looks fine, could you please make an extra check for me to see if the "SiteFile.csv" is generated correctly in the configured directory: "C:/Users/Emily/Documents/R2D/LocalWorkDir\\HazardSimulation\\GroundMotions\\Input"?

Thanks,
Kuanshi

41
Regional Hazard Simulation (R2D, rWhale) / Re: Hazard Simulation Error exit code 1
« on: July 13, 2021, 09:23:09 PM »
Hi emongold,

It seems that the hazard simulation script is not launched correctly... it would be appreciated if you'd like to share (1) one snapshot of the "Preferences" window (can be launched by clicking on "File"->"Preferences" in the top menu bar) and (2) the configuration file "EQHazardConfiguration.json" in the working directory ("C:\Users\emily\Documents\R2D\LocalWorkDir\HazardSimulation\Input")..  and I'm happy to help troubleshooting it.

Thanks,
Kuanshi

42
Earthquake Engineering (EE-UQ) / Re: Suite Average for PEER NGA selection
« on: July 13, 2021, 06:58:29 PM »
Hi Anne,

Yes, we currently use the "Arithmetic" to minimize the error in the selection, but will add an extra drop-down box for both options for "PEER NGA" in the next release .

Regards,
Kuanshi

43
Earthquake Engineering (EE-UQ) / Re: .csv upload for user-defined target spectrum
« on: July 10, 2021, 03:16:32 AM »
Hi Anne,

Thanks for your feedback and suggestions - yes, we would try to add the csv file uploading feature for user-defined target spectrum, and make it easier for specifying the scaling factors for individual ground motions when using "Multiple PEER" records downloaded previously from PEER NGA webtool.

Regards,
Kuanshi

44
Earthquake Engineering (EE-UQ) / Re: saving results from EE-UQ
« on: July 10, 2021, 03:04:37 AM »
Yes, we would like to set the default format as .csv for saving the tabulated results and this feature will be available in the next release.

45
Earthquake Engineering (EE-UQ) / Re: EE-UQ with Steel Building Model - error: Dakota files not generated
« on: July 10, 2021, 03:02:35 AM »
Following up the post, the issue were resolved together with Anne: the local "Not Response" error was caused by the convergence problem in OpenSees which held the thread and froze the RES tab, and it was addressed by increasing the tolerance in the nonlinear_analysis_solver.tcl.

Thanks to Anne, another related bug was also reported for running the AutoSDA via Design-Safe/Stampede. And we fixed a pandas package issue and several directory problems. Latest changes are incorporated and available for the use on the Stampede now.

Regards,
Kuanshi

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4